On 03/30/2010 04:22 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
I vote as follows:
On 3/30/10 2:37 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
6695 1 2.0 coppro Purple Sentencing Reform
AGAINST
[My apologies for not proofing your proposal earlier, coppro, but...
Eh, it seems to be tradition these days
Nits that are fixable:
Okay; these could also be fixed by a later proposal, mind you.
* "becoming inactive during this period" (definite bug)
Oops. It's not like we've actually handed out a TIME OUT.
* "an equal number of rests" -- what if the accused now has fewer rests
than the number that were created? (the current rule might have this
sort of problem, too, though I thought we had some odd case about that)
I presume all of them would be destroyed; that seems like a
simple-enough matter of interpretation.
* suggest replacing "when it takes" with "when this sentence takes" to
avoid retarded monkey interpretations;
Could do. I wanted to keep it short.
* "Individuality Disservice"???
I couldn't think up a good name for it, so I took the opposite of
Community Disservice.
-coppro
