On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 17:41, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> In the absence of this self-ratification, I would interpret that >> "PerlNomic" implicitly came to refer to the normish instance as soon as >> it was up and the nomic.info instance was down (even without Rainer's >> consent), but that c.'s dictatorship was invalid from Agora's >> perspective because the other parties had considerably less than 4 days >> to review it. > > The two players I attempted to mousetrap, ais523 and Wooble, had less > than 4 days to review it, but both did explicitly review it (IIRC they > both voted against it) before the amendment was made. The other > parties can consider themselves not bound if they wish. > Even if parties were not mousetrapped the text of the contract was still modified, thus c.'s later transfer of assets and termination were effective.
BobTHJ
