On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:03, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Having received no objections, I make the above contract change. > > Aren't dependent actions still broken? > > There is still dispute on that issue. Even if they are broken however this shouldn't prevent the contract defined mimic of a dependent action. Worst case it would still work using the common definition of objection.
BobTHJ
