c-walker wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Charles > Walker<charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>> 2675: FALSE >> Accepting this judgement, I do the following: >> >> I act on behalf of the LNP to cause it to intend, with Agoran Consent, >> to register. >> >> I intend, without Livenomicer objection, to cause the LNP to register. >> (After having gained Agoran Consent). >> >> I intend, without Livenomicer objection, to amend the LNP by replacing >> >> A Livenomicer CAN act on behalf of the LNP to cause it to intend, >> with Agoran Consent, to register. >> >> with: >> >> A Livenomicer CAN act on behalf of the LNP to cause it to intend, >> with Agoran Consent, to register, and to resolve this intent. > > Having received no objections, I make the above contract change.
Aren't dependent actions still broken?
