Kerim Aydin wrote: > It's not R1728 intent unless you specify the "method and value for N" > for each method. If you do state Method and N, however, you've begun a > legal process called a "dependent action". You've become an initiator. > It is a multipart action, but starting the process and taking that > legal role can be said to be part of attempting to complete it.
I disagree. R1728 says:
a) A person (the initiator) announced intent to perform the
action, unambiguously and clearly specifying the action and
method(s) (including the value of N for each method)
I read this as two separate requirements: (i) that e announce intent
(where "intent" has not been defined and thus has its natural-language
meaning), and (ii) that e specify the action and method(s).
... Unless, of course, "intent" has an technical legal-jargon meaning?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
