coppro wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:10, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I intend, with Support, to publish an NoV alleging that ais523 violated >>> the 1-power Rule 2143 by failing to report the Recognition switch during >>> the month of July. >>> >>> I intend, with 2 Support, to publish an NoV alleging that Murphy >>> violated the 1-power Rule 2215 by stating that quorum for the decision >>> to adopt proposal 6414 was 8 when it was either 6 or 7. >>> >> Even though the rules permit it, I don't think it wise to punish >> officers for an unintentional oversight, as long as it is corrected >> quickly and not continuously repeated. Of course, if you think >> otherwise you should call three NoVs against yourself for errors in >> Poobah DoG salary payments. >> >> BobTHJ > E previously made a quorum mistake and stated eir program calculates > quorum at the time of resolution. E made no attempt to fix those errors.
Admitted, but OTOH it isn't a frequent error (most weeks see the same quorum as the previous week, and most proposals achieve quorum by a comfortable margin). That said, I'll see about revamping the system this weekend for temporal awareness of registration and activity.
