On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Pavitra wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I understand, will you trust me enough if I say 6407-6409 are straightforward >> and needed bug fixes (by Wooble, coppro, and me) that everyone I think has >> voted FOR so far, so a simple FOR would be greatly appreciated there? > > In that case, shouldn't PRESENT work just as well and not require trust?
I meant to suggest PRESENT, but ais523 figured it out. :) In any case, there's still trust involved... if the vote is strongly FOR, a refusal to vote could kill it where as a PRESENT is as good as a FOR. -G.
