G. wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, Paul VanKoughnett wrote: >>> On a partially-related note, all elections should include a VACANT >>> option. Or perhaps only if someone 'nominates' it? Vacant-option with 3 >>> support? >>> >>> EMPTY THRONE >>> >> Why? What if this happened to e. g. the Promotor? >> > > On one hand it's no worse than the fact that the Promotor (or whomever) > can just resign and leave the office vacant.
And, on that point: while Promotor is vacant, anyone can deputise for em by announcement; and in case of emergency (e.g. Promotor repealed, deputisation broken) any player can distribute a proposal Without 3 Objections (Rule 106, paragraph 4), and if that doesn't work either then Rule 1698 probably applies.
