On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> That non-existence (if you accept it) doesn't necessarily end the decision >> that's been initiated legally ;) -G. > > It doesn't, and the decision still exists, but it's about whether to > adopt Proposal 6072, which no longer contains that text. If the > decision is resolved, it will cause the amended proposal to take > effect by Rule 106.
We're talking in circles now. > (But why the hurry? I wasn't lying about Citizenship being secured [R869] :) No, I found that. It was to create another aspect of the case in a timely manner. -Goethe
