On Friday 28 November 2008 09:44:35 am Kerim Aydin wrote: > The unappealable thing hasn't changed, I think it was "always" that > way, so it's just attitudes somehow, don't know why. I have > noticed Callers tend to put much less effort into arguments than > they used to, and original judges aren't willing to judge > "UNDETERMINED - lack of caller effort" as much. I wonder if the > return of DISMISS would help. Don't know why the fear of Affirm is > there either. Even an "unappealable" judgement can be effectively > overturned by a new case if anything new comes up - precedent is > something but not everything. -G.
I would support a separate judgement for "the caller is lazy"; perhaps UNCONTESTED?
