On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 07:20 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > How can you have the audacity to even suggest with a straight face that > a REMAND of a guilty that was wholly uncontested is appropriate? Why > should anyone bother to judge anymore knowing that they will have to > fight tooth and nail for even trivially correct judgements in the face > of blatant dishonesty? It's not an "interesting test", it's complete and > utter bullshit that is frankly destroying something I have enjoyed for > nearly eight years. I really, really hope somebody does something > comparable to something that you enjoy one day.
What would destroy Agora is, I think, inappropriate judicial arguments that weren't contested. The judgement itself normally doesn't actually matter. Incidentally, I encourage you to think of an ingenious way to actually punish comex for eir scams. Actually, I have a better proto: remove criminal and equity CFJs altogether, and move inquiry cases to a-d. The judicial system is too important to put inside a nomic where it can be scammed, and influence the game. And if criminal cases didn't exist, it would give people an incentive to actually obey the rules. When there are no criminal cases, not obeying the rules is cheating. When there are, not obeying the rules is suddenly doing something is OK if you're willing to accept the punishment for it, it seems. -- ais523
