Elysion wrote: > On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:49:16 +0000 > Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8 Nov 2008, at 19:14, Sgeo wrote: >> >>> Might I point out that if they were to invade us with a sufficiently >>> large invasion force, Agora would lose, badly, in weeks? >> >> You serious? I doubt half of them could even make a working proposal... > > If their capabilities are so questionable (as has been suggested by multiple > emails now), why are we so concerned with their recognition? Is Agora really > so insecure as to require validation at every available opportunity?
This would be recognition in a different sphere of influence, formalizing "Agora sometimes behaves more like a country" from the web site. pikhq wanted to contact Sealand; I was being more modest.
