On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, comex wrote: >> Why does general may meaning CAN lead to false? Rule 105 CANNOT is >> contradicted by Rule 2192 CAN. > > Okay, I'll pay attention to this argument, it's simple. > > R105 => CANNOT. > R2192 is not CAN. It's "CAN if R2141 general may." > And R105 CANNOT => !R141 may. > > Therefore R105 CANNOT => !R2141 may => !R2192 CAN => CANNOT. > > No contradiction.
Hmm... you're right. :( Well, It doesn't matter. Does it? Surely the Mad Scientist can simply act on behalf of the Monster to permit Rule Changes? Admittedly, permission is usually supposed to be in a Rule's text, not a one-off thing. But there's no reason the latter wouldn't work.
