On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, comex wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, I just mean what's your metric of "most people", > > Everyone in the discussion of ais523's judgement of CFJ 2213 concluded > that it is reasonable, or at least nobody's clearly posted why it > isn't; besides, nobody's asked ais523 to continue posting logs of > #really-a-cow, and the interests-of-the-game argument grows with the > size of the log.
Okay, no biggie, I just thought I might have missed a bunch of discussion about this (maybe on the channel) so was curious, I kinda dislike feeling rushed-to-consensus because I'm told it was "all decided by most people" somewhere hidden. As you know I think Officers can make just about any call they want about an uncertain state (including just saying "I personally think it worked so...") as long as they annotate that its unsettled. I'm actually waiting to see if the Spam Scam precedents knock out the whole forum from the beginning (no opinion there yet either). -Goethe
