On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:43 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET > CoE: This is missing the "Scams to fix Scams[ters]" rule I scammed into > the ruleset earlier this week.
Admitted. Public support for the scam working is such that I'll add that Rule to the Ruleset. Still, I am going to treat the Sgeo's Monstrous Consent followup scam as ineffective. (I also need to account for the effects of Proposals 5734 and 5739.)
