On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, comex wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Uh, how precisely did you measure that? > > I think it's reasonable that if most people think a scam worked, the > results of the scam should be included in the Ruleset with a note that > the scam may have failed. If CFJ 2213 is affirmed, I'll remove the > note; if it's overturned, I'll remove the rule.
No, I just mean what's your metric of "most people", maybe I haven't been paying attention but I've seen some opinions from the scammers and a couple watching closely but not from many really. (I personally haven't looked closely so have no opinion other than judgements made by scammers should be checked by appeals or reassigned). -Goethe
