On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ 2117
That contradicts CFJ 2002. "Monster" and by association "Monstrous" are either defined by the rules or not. It can't be both ways. -root
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ 2117
That contradicts CFJ 2002. "Monster" and by association "Monstrous" are either defined by the rules or not. It can't be both ways. -root