On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Really, P5719 passed at the worst possible time; I didn't even expect >> it to pass. Nevertheless... >> >> I intend, with Monstrous Consent, to remove this from Rule 2193: >> A player MAY perform an action on behalf of The Monster with >> Monstrous Consent. > > It's still legible. Hardly monstrous at all.
In any case, "Monstrous Consent" clearly means the consent of the Monster, not consent that is monstrous in scale, and in any further case, this consent is not monstrous at all; it's only been written monstrously. I suppose the Mad Scientist could act on behalf of the Monster to give its consent, though. -root
