On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Really, P5719 passed at the worst possible time; I didn't even expect
>>> it to pass. Nevertheless...
>>>
>>> I intend, with Monstrous Consent, to remove this from Rule 2193:
>>> A player MAY perform an action on behalf of The Monster with
>>> Monstrous Consent.
>>
>> It's still legible. Hardly monstrous at all.
>
> In any case, "Monstrous Consent" clearly means the consent of the
> Monster, not consent that is monstrous in scale, and in any further
> case, this consent is not monstrous at all; it's only been written
> monstrously.
>
> I suppose the Mad Scientist could act on behalf of the Monster to give
> its consent, though.
>
> -root
>
CFJ 2117
