I vote as follows: On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:23, The PerlNomic Partnership <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > 5708 O 1 1.0 comex <none> AGAINST x 2 > 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ AGAINST > 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic rights and privileges endorse Murphy > 5711 O 1 1.7 Murphy Community service (endorse Murphy) x 2 > 5712 D 1 3.0 Murphy Relaxed security PRESENT > 5713 O 1 1.0 comex You want C Nomic!?!?!?!? AGAINST x 2 > 5714 D 0 3.0 ais523 No Monsters for You AGAINST > 5715 O 1 1.7 Murphy Judicial Declarations FOR x 2 (Reluctantly: I'd prefer to not have a mechanism that is based on self-ratifying things that a majority of the players believed false at the time they were published, as it somewhat overloads self-ratification...) > 5716 D 1 3.0 Murphy Standard sock puppet policy FOR (but I'd prefer we spell out that the claim of identity does not include personhood and other similar attributes, and that selecting a separate name without attempting to announce it as a nickname in any fashion amounts to a claim of identity to be a different name, as is apparently intended) > 5717 D 1 3.0 Murphy Resolve ambiguous executors AGAINST > 5718 O 1 1.0 ais523 The IADoP is always right FOR > 5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! AGAINST x 2 > 5720 D 1 3.0 woggle Secured self-ratification FOR > 5721 D 1 3.0 comex Secured self-ratification AGAINST > 5722 D 1 3.0 Murphy No, Mr. Garrison, we cannot get rid of all > the Mexicans AGAINST > 5723 D 1 2.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (rule-defined entities) FOR > 5724 D 1 3.0 ais523 Combining the Gamestates AGAINST > 5725 D 1 2.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (players) FOR > 5726 O 1 1.7 Murphy Opinion in both directions FOR x 2
- woggle
