Goethe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> from adequate information that (a) is clearly identified in the >> voting message and (b) is or will be reasonably and readily available >> to and interpretable by any player at all times between the end of >> the voting period and the deadline for resolving the decision. > > Ah, just realized there are two time limits to consider; information > must be *available* continuously between the end of the voting period > and the resolution deadline, but the truth value of the conditional > must be evaluated as it was *at* the end of the voting period. Sound > right?
I think it should be evaluated at the time of resolution, to ensure that e.g. "6001: FOR if 6000 passed" works. (Gets messy if the resolution of 6000 is accidentally invalid, but I can't think of a good way around that. If the resolution of 6000 is deliberately invalid or delayed, then you should move to sack the Assessor.)
