On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Fails, the decision in question didn't exist when woggle attempted to >> democratise it, so eir action failed due to not clearly specifying what >> it was talking about. > > How much clearer could it be than specifying the exact ID number of > the proposal it intended to democritize? > > I call for judgement, barring ais523, on "Proposal 5707 is a > democratic proposal."
I agree with ais523, though it's not really a matter of clarity. Per R1728, "A player authorized to perform a dependent action (the initiator) CAN publicly announce eir intent to do so...", thus announcing intent to perform a dependent action is itself a regulated action. At the time woggle announced eir intent, e was not authorized to perform the dependent action (which is also regulated), so e COULD NOT effectively announce eir intent at that time. -root
