On 30 Sep 2008, at 18:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I thought the whole *purpose* of MMI was to set up this conceit, that
CAN and CANNOT sets the game "physics".  This is supported by every
precedent I am aware of as well as words like IMPOSSIBLE.  Of course I
am aware of the self-referential issue of using law to set physics so
that it is "not law but physics."

-Goethe

I think of the ruleset as the laws of physics, except that the laws of
physics make the law as such too.

Reply via email to