Wooble wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I believe precedent is that if a disclaimer implies that something may >> not actually be true, it's not an announcement. > > If so, we need to calculate a whole lot of gamestate. "I vote 5* FOR. > Disclaimer: this might not work, I'm not sure what my EVLOD is" would > then cancel the whole vote.
I believe more specific precedent is that if a disclaimer implies that something may not actually be true for a specified reason, but that reason turns out to be false, then it's still an announcement.
