On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:58 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I believe precedent is that if a disclaimer implies that something may >> not actually be true, it's not an announcement. > > If so, we need to calculate a whole lot of gamestate. "I vote 5* FOR. > Disclaimer: this might not work, I'm not sure what my EVLOD is" would > then cancel the whole vote.
Well, in that case, I'd say that "this might not work" is best interpreted as "these votes might not be valid", as it is POSSIBLE to cast any number of votes on a proposal. /me shrugs. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
