On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 12:56 PM, "Ian Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Whether an entity is biological is similarly not ratifiable, for the >>>> same reason. >>>> >>>> >>> Goethe's arguments in CFJ 2165 would disagree with you.
The actual question is whether ratifying "Goethe has 5 points" ratifies the fact that Goethe exists and is an entity capable of having points. (which if allowed would set up a set of inferences that ratified em to be a first-class person). That was an example of the second type in my CFJ and I specifically argued that it was *not* ratifiable. -Goethe
