On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Preferred alternative: It ratified that: > 1. The message was sent by "Phill" > 2. We now know that Phill is a non-person. > 3. Therefore the entity who sent the message is a non-person. > 4. The entity "Elliot Hird" sent the message. > 5. Therefore we have ratified that Elliot Hird is a non-person. > 5. Therefore Elliot Hird cannot be (and can't ever again be) a first-class > player.
I'm afraid that your premises 1, 2, and 4 are in conflict. -root
