On 24 Sep 2008, at 18:07, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Phill is a person, no ratification necessary, unless you're
claiming
that either you're not Phill or you're not a person.
I am arguing that I am not Phill, yes, that it ratified as Phill,
who didn't
previously exist. I'm not convinced that IS what happened, but
that's kind
of
what I'm _hoping_, so to speak.
No, you established Phill as an alias for yourself by sending the
message and signing it that. When it ratified, it didn't spring
Phill
into existence. It just ratified that the message was sent by you.
Preferred alternative: It ratified that:
An alternative isn't more viable just because you prefer it.
1. The message was sent by "Phill"
2. We now know that Phill is a non-person.
3. Therefore the entity who sent the message is a non-person.
4. The entity "Elliot Hird" sent the message.
5. Therefore we have ratified that Elliot Hird is a non-person.
5. Therefore Elliot Hird cannot be (and can't ever again be) a
first-class
player.
This doesn't work because you have two step fives.
What bribe do I need to make to have these CFJs assigned to me,
Murphy?
-Goethe
A bribe more than I need to make to get the judgements appealed.
