On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:17, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: The message sent by "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > on "Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:16:23 +0000" (see evidence 1) was successful in > initiating a CFJ. > > I argue for a FALSE judgement in this case. The statement in the message > is clearly an inquiry case. Rule 591 (see evidence 2) governs inquiry > cases. In Rule 591, we see that, "the initiator is unqualified to be > assigned as judge of the case." > > The message in question clearly does not indicate who sent the message. > Without knowing who sent the message, there is no way to ensure that the > initiator is unqualified to be assigned as judge of the case. For all we > know, Sir Toby was the sender of the message. Since he was assigned as > judge of the resulting CFJ, it is possible that he was illegally > assigned as judge to that CFJ.
While I agree that it may have been IMPOSSIBLE to assign Sir Toby as the judge of that case (not ILLEGAL, I suggest CoE'ing on the relevant docket and such), I don't think it has much relevance in the success of the initiation... -woggle
