Sir Toby wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >>> Identification is not a toggle switch with values "unambiguously >>> identified" and "completely unidentified". The message identifies its >>> sender as a player, which is ambiguous but still communicates much >>> more than if it contained no statement of identification at all. >> Just like writing a message in Turkish and identifying the language >> as Turkish clearly communicates that there is a message but for the >> purposes of the rules doesn't communicate the content. You know the >> CFJ of which I speak. > > I do not know of this CFJ. Can someone illuminate me please?
I can't find it, but I believe it involved someone using the Turkish word for a vote value (without identifying the language, even).
