On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > distributing the proposal, and Rule 106 refers to a proposal having an > author; a message claiming to submit a proposal without providing this > information is probably too vague to count as a game action.
On second thought, the rules don't define the submission of a proposal as an action by announcement, so the ambiguity clause of R478 probably doesn't apply. If the person who submitted the proposal is in fact a player, they've probably met R106's requirements. Still, I believe that the Promotor CANNOT distribute the proposal in question, and the message's claim to have been published by "invalid invalid" (who is not a player) will self-ratify, meaning the proposal was never legal.
