On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:17 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another point: if a document defines an asset as a currency, does that > explicitly permit free exchanges of it?
No. Transferability is subject to modification by the backing document, the same as for any asset. In the RPG example, I believe the language in the proto is sufficient, although "fixed" is a rules-defined term it's not required to use it to make an asset nontransferable.
