On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sure, it just prevents that thing from being done by a non-instrument. > > And it should be noted that securing at power 0 in effect secures at > power 1, since you can't have a proposal with an AI < 1.0.
It's still possible to have instruments with power less than 1, though I've never seen it happen in practice. -root
