Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5696-5699

[ais523]

On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 13:58 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be easier to manipulate point holdings at Power=1 to award
> > wins to all relevant persons.
> 
> Proto:
> 
> Append the following text to Rule 2166 (Assets):
> 
>       Creation, destruction, and changes in ownership of assets not
>       explicitly permitted by their backing document are secured, with
>       a power threshold equal to the power of the backing document.
> 
> I'll propose this once I verify that it doesn't break any of the
> existing assets.
Wouldn't this break contract-defined assets? (Can you secure something
at power 0?)
-- 
ais523