On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I recuse myself from this case. I act on behalf of comex to transfer >>> one prop from myself to CotC Murphy. >> >> Prop transfers require a reason, so this was probably ineffective, >> unless you think the juxtaposition of the sentences counts as >> "explaining why". I won't opine on whether this was a purposeful >> attempt to prevent anyone else from successfully performing such a >> transfer, or a mistake... > > I'm interpreting the use of your transfer-props-on-my-behalf contract > as indicating the same reason as you used when you established it. > > Any chance of an Airstrip One report?
BobTHJ