comex wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I recuse myself from this case. I act on behalf of comex to transfer >> one prop from myself to CotC Murphy. > > Prop transfers require a reason, so this was probably ineffective, > unless you think the juxtaposition of the sentences counts as > "explaining why". I won't opine on whether this was a purposeful > attempt to prevent anyone else from successfully performing such a > transfer, or a mistake...
I'm interpreting the use of your transfer-props-on-my-behalf contract as indicating the same reason as you used when you established it.
