2008/7/26 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Irrelevant. You can possess a contract-defined asset without > belonging to that contract (I possess some chits, for instance). > >
Ah, true. This means that contracts can affect non-parties. Creepy...
2008/7/26 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Irrelevant. You can possess a contract-defined asset without > belonging to that contract (I possess some chits, for instance). > >
Ah, true. This means that contracts can affect non-parties. Creepy...