On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is just a proto of a contract. I do not agree to this contract at
> this time.
>
> {
> This is a public contract called "Vote Market Insurance". Parties to
> this contract are known as Insurees.
>
> Any entity that either possesses VP or is bound by the Vote Market may
> join this contract by announcement.
>
> Total VP is defined as the total amount of VP possessed by all
> Insurees taken together.
>
> Any Insuree may leave this contract by announcement, as long as e is
> not a debtor, as defined by this contract, and as long as eir leaving
> would not cause the Total VP to become less than 50.
>
> No Insuree may take any action that would cause the Total VP to become
> less than 50 VP if it is currently equal to or greater than 50 VP.
>
> Any insuree, hereafter known as the debtor may, by announcement, act
> on behalf of another insuree, hereafter known as the creditor, to have
> any positive amount of the creditor's VP to be transfered to the
> debtor. Upon doing so, the debtor is considered to owe that amount of
> VP to the creditor, and the debtor SHALL return that amount of VP to
> the creditor within 24 hours of having taken the VP from the creditor
> in this manner.
>
> Any creditor who is currently an Insuree may, by announcement, act on
> behalf of any of eir debtors to cause the debtor to give the creditor
> the amount of VP that the debtor owes. This does not cause the
> creditor to be a debtor, however, if the debtor now owes no VP to
> anyone, e ceases to be a debtor.
>
> All Insurees SHOULD try to get the Total VP to be greater than or
> equal to 50VP if it is not currently so.
> }
>
Erm, there should be a clause allowing amendment:
{
Any insuree may, without 3 Insuree objections, amend this contract
}
