On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ehird had already changed eir name to tusho at the time and was not a >>> player in any case. It is not clear whether the precedent from CFJs >>> 1703 and 1361 would still apply in this case. >>> >>> -root >>> >> >> Which is (i believe) the point of tusho's "ehird is a player" CFJ > > I see. In the spirit of laziness, I'll leave the player list as is > until the CFJ is resolved. > > -root >
Hooray for the agoran spirit of laziness.
