On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ehird had already changed eir name to tusho at the time and was not a >> player in any case. It is not clear whether the precedent from CFJs >> 1703 and 1361 would still apply in this case. >> >> -root >> > > Which is (i believe) the point of tusho's "ehird is a player" CFJ
I see. In the spirit of laziness, I'll leave the player list as is until the CFJ is resolved. -root
