On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > No, doer vs non-doer would not be a question of rights. Only people have > rights, > and thus partnerships wouldn't.
Do you even read the ruleset? R2145. I suppose one could make the argument that R101 applies to "natural" persons only and so supersedes the R754-granted ability to define terms, but I can't see any way to support that argument. -Goethe
