On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to test the above but, instead of a secretary I will have a
> friend send a message though my e-mail account, registering emself.

I think that this would be similar to CFJ 1719.  However, if you asked
your friend to perform an action you dictate through eir own email
account, that might be interesting (does a person have the authority
to act like a SMTP server and relay messages?)  Relatedly, what if the
Distributor banned someone from the lists and e could not participate
in the fora except by proxy?

By the way, I would like to point out that in Goethe's situation it
might indeed be argued that  the time of the action is in fact when
_Goethe's_ action leaves _Goethe's_ TDoC.  If this is the case, there
would be the scam analogous to if the Distributor held for a few days,
but did not reject entirely, a message with the intent to ratify a
fake ruleset.  So perhaps the opposite is in the best interests of the
game, but I'm not sure if there is precedent regarding this.  Maybe
with Steve's Spam Scam?

Reply via email to