On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 July 2008 08:18:54 pm Sgeo wrote:
>>> this amount of the currency, specifies a
>>> maximum FINE amount, and the amount is no greater than the
>>
>> Should be:
>>> this amount of the currency, and the backing document specifies
>>> a maximum FINE amount, and the amount is no greater than the
>>
>> Pavitra
>>
>
> Why have a maximum fine amount? This again restricts which currencies
> can be fined to those contracts that specify a maximum. Wouldn't it be
> better to allow the judge to decide a fair fine amount and appeal that
> case for unfair amounts?
>
> BobTHJ
>
If a contract wants to allow full judicial discretion, it can just
specify an incredibly huge max. fine amount.. unless you want just any
currency to be finable?
