On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 10 July 2008 08:18:54 pm Sgeo wrote: >> this amount of the currency, specifies a >> maximum FINE amount, and the amount is no greater than the > > Should be: >> this amount of the currency, and the backing document specifies >> a maximum FINE amount, and the amount is no greater than the > > Pavitra >
Why have a maximum fine amount? This again restricts which currencies can be fined to those contracts that specify a maximum. Wouldn't it be better to allow the judge to decide a fair fine amount and appeal that case for unfair amounts? BobTHJ
