On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, the rules (especially rules with power less than 2, that of rule >> 2145, "Partnerships") can't just create partnerships; to be a >> partnership, something has to be "a binding agreement governed by the >> rules which devolves its legal obligations onto a subset of its >> parties, numbering at least two, collectively" to be a partnership. > > It works when Rule 2169 does it, doesn't it?
I don't believe the rules (especially those with power below 3) can just create binding agreements among people, as "Every person has the right to refuse to become party to a binding agreement. The absence of a person's explicit, willful consent shall be considered a refusal." --Ivan Hope CXXVII
