On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't mind seeing it go either.  If we do that, we can get
> probably rid of VVLOD as well and just have EVLOD be changed directly.

I thought the rationale for having both was more to make it so you
don't need to keep track of exactly when each change is made in
relation to the start of each voting period and just have the
effective ones change all at once at the start of the week.

Reply via email to