On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably my mistake was because the result of EVLOD=VVLOD is rounded to an > integer, and both are set to the rounded value. That made me jump to the > conclusion that the value being rounded could somehow end up not an integer.
It's not currently possible to get a non-integral VVLOD, but it has been in the past. For example, when we were using VCs instead of Notes, it was possible to spend a combination of VCs to decimate another player's VVLOD. Wooble wrote: > Speaking of which, has their recently been a way to achieve a > non-integer VVLOD? Is there any good reason not to just make VVLOD an > integer and get rid of that awful sentence? I wouldn't mind seeing it go either. If we do that, we can get probably rid of VVLOD as well and just have EVLOD be changed directly. -root
