On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > root wrote: >> What VVLOD/EVLOD averaging? > Ah, I misread rule 2156; all this time I thought it said that at the end of > each week the EVLOD and VVLOD were averaged and both set to the same value. > And I've read that rule several times! > > Presumably my mistake was because the result of EVLOD=VVLOD is rounded to an > integer, and both are set to the rounded value. That made me jump to the > conclusion that the value being rounded could somehow end up not an integer. > -- > ais523 >
Speaking of which, has their recently been a way to achieve a non-integer VVLOD? Is there any good reason not to just make VVLOD an integer and get rid of that awful sentence?
