On 5/30/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > None of the other offices have such powerful 'perks'. I think this is > part of what makes CotC elections so hotly contested while other > offices struggle to keep officers who can publish a regular report.
Despite Murphy's comment, I think that a good CotC can manipulate judge selection such that e knows the judge of a controversial case will deliver comprehensive and reasonable arguments, but is near certain to deliver a judgement favorable to the CotC. This possibility is hardly a bad thing; it makes the game more interesting (and prevents the CotC office from suffering a lack of report like all the rest).
