On Friday 9 May 2008 6:27:08 Elliott Hird wrote: > 2008/5/10 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The issue is not whether you have been in existence forever, but > > whether you have been a member of the chain forever. Let's assume you > > have always been bound by the conditions, even before the > > meta-...-religions became Agoran contracts, even before Agoran > > contract law existed. > > > > In this case, you have had an infinite length of time (surely a > > "reasonable opportunity" to review the text of these contracts, and > > decide not to be considered bound by them. Since, after this infinite > > time, you published a statement indicating that you are bound by the > > Agoracontractian Religion, it follows that your R101(v) right has > > expired unused. You are thus fully bound by the last paragraph of > > R1742 and its "not impaired by contradiction" clause. > > Actually, after a few, the chains start specifying something akin to > the Ducks & Platypuses contract: that I may not leave them, so on > and so forth, etc. Thus putting me in the same situation.
That actually doesn't matter. You could have exercised your R101(v) rights with respect to every contract in the chain simultaneously, had you been so inclined. Since you didn't, you are bound by the contracts with your full consent, and so R101(v) is no longer usable, and so R1742 binds you with full effect, and so you are culpable under Agoran law.
